Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] No Flash - Proposed being part of IceCat

[Ivan Zaigralin]

IMHO, we should be removing some (or may be even all) addons from the
default icecat install, not adding more. I really like the fact that
upon the first run, icecat prompts the user to check/uncheck the privacy
features, and I am very happy about LibreJS being labeled as
/experimental/ (/ineffective/ would be closer to the mark). This
actually makes the whole practice somewhat palatable, and now I just
wish none of the privacy addons were on by default. Surely a user can
check a few boxes?

Also, SpyBlock should probably be described better here (that it blocks
ads, etc.)

Also, video addon should probably be added to that checkbox list.

On 03/21/2015 01:29 PM, David Englund wrote:
> *HTML5 Video Everywhere!**Note:* "Some legacy sites force using Flash
> player, you will need to install no-flash134
> <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-flash/> add-on to
> support them." -
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/html5-video-everywhere/
> 
> 
> I strongly propose thatNo Flash
> (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-flash/) should be
> part of future versions of IceCat.
> 
> 
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature