Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Introducing Extension Signing: A Safer Add-on Experience

[David Englund/Hedlund]

On 2015-03-30 05:23, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote:
> > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experience/
> Such signing requirement doesn't let the user run a modified copy of an 
> extension on their own computer, until the user figures out how to disable it. 
> IceCat folks would probably just disable the signing requirement by default.
>
> Svetlana
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
My understanding is that Firefox just will tell the user that an add-on 
that is going to be installed is either signed or not signed. But I have 
not read the article.