Felix,
There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you search
there just with 'font'.
The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems,
browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they rely
on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to
about:config.
wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji look
like for you with text?
For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea
(editing an article).
wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug-gnuzilla,
and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed
anyway, then I won't :cc you.
-M.
2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich <address@hidden>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I sent
to Mart. Here you go:
Hi Mart,
Great! Thanks for the advice.
I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following about:config
settings:
* font.name.monospace.x-unicode
* font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode
* font.name.serif.x-unicode
Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, though ^^
I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can manage
this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font.
- --
Felix Fröhlich
GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote:
Hi all,
So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and bug-
gnuz
address@hidden because for some reason I believed that was the
correct email address... Please don't ask me why.
Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji (see
below).
I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the Noto
Color
Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font shows up
as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see
attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the
uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big deal,
really.
Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine.
Thanks again for your help, Mart!
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC
Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD
TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL
vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW
YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ
A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38
pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP
ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378
Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY
tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0
qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/
jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0=
=1nZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org