|
Thanks, Pjotr.
So I got it working on one system out of four, following the
exact same steps each time:
- Debian 9 (Stretch) - 4.9.130-2 x86_64 (real system) - fail
- Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) - 4.13.0-46-lowlatency (real
system) - fail
- Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) - 4.4.0-31-generic - fail
- Debian 9 (Stretch) - 4.9.0-8-amd64 (VM) - works
I don't know what the significant differentiating factor could
be, that lets guix behave correctly on that one debian system but
not on the others.
But what I also noticed, is that the "list of substitutes" is
also not being updated on the three failing systems. Is the update
process using the download script internally, maybe, and that
silently fails? Or maybe this hints at another problem?
I fear there's nothing more I can immediately do. @Ludo - can you
help?
On 16/02/19 10:17, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Sorry about that.
If you get it to work, do update the document - or me by E-mail. Maybe
Ludo has something to say about this.
Pj.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Florian Thevissen wrote:
Hi pjotr,
Did you try something like
proot -0 -b /proc -b /dev -b /etc -r . -b etc_guix/acl:/etc/guix/acl
gnu/store/vir3l..-guix-0.x/bin/guix-daemon —disable-chroot
Yes, this doesn’t work - with or without the -0 flag.
That used to work. But maybe no longer?
I tried the new guix binaries (0.16.0), and the ones that were recent
when you wrote the guide (0.13.0), and proot has not, if I see
correctly, significantly changed since then (v.5.1.0).
To me, this looks as if the setup on my particular system had something
special to it that would lead guix to not behave correctly. Here’s a
#guix chat-log, where Saone (at 00:25:29) comes to the same conclusion:
[1]https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-09-21 .
For the record - this happens on an Debian 4.9.130-2 x86_64 system.
I'll try this out on other systems/VMs today...
On 16/02/19 07:34, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Did you try something like
proot -0 -b /proc -b /dev -b /etc -r . -b etc_guix/acl:/etc/guix/acl gnu/store/v
ir3l..-guix-0.x/bin/guix-daemon --disable-chroot
(note the extra -0 and chroot switches) and you should see on a guix package ins
tall.
That used to work. But maybe no longer?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 09:39:21PM +0100, Florian Thevissen wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get guix to run on a system where I do not have root
access, following a guide by pjotrp involving proot, here:
[1][2]https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/GUIX-NO-ROOT.org .
All guix operations that involve the script perform-download fail with
the error:
guix perform-download: error: refusing to run with elevated
privileges (UID 0)
I am not sure if this hints at a bug in guix itself, but a comment in
the guix sources lets me assume so. It says in
package-management.scm:355
“Note that scripts like ‘guix perform-download’ do not run as root
(…)”
In my setup, following this guide, however, it apparently is run as
root, and (assert-low-privileges) in the script perform-download.scm:89
acts accordingly by signalling the error and exiting.
(By the way - running guix-daemon with proot root privileges fails
(-0), and running it without (no -0) fails also.)
Now my question: why is perform-download run as root following pjotrs
guide, and is there anything that can be done about it?
I am a bit at a loss here, being unfamiliar with the guix sources and
overall system setup.
Looking forward to help, thanks,
Florian
References
1. [3]https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/GUIX-NO-ROOT.org
References
1. https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-09-21
2. https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/GUIX-NO-ROOT.org
3. https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/GUIX-NO-ROOT.org
|