[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by s
From: |
Joshua Branson |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:28:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Could somebody give this a try?
>
> Samuel
>
> samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, le dim. 20 janv. 2019 16:48:19 +0000, a ecrit:
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24110
>>
>> --- Comment #3 from Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> ---
>> Created attachment 11553
>> --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11553&action=edit
>> proposed fix
>>
>> So AIUI the issue is just that SS_DISABLE is missing in the flags?
>>
>> Could somebody test the attached patch?
I can try, but my current Hurd vm, doesn't have internet access. So
that may be a bit hard for me to do properly, but time permitting, I'll
give it a go.
>
--
Joshua Branson
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
- [Bug hurd/24110] New: SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, bruno at clisp dot org, 2019/01/20
- [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, address@hidden, 2019/01/20
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/22
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack,
Joshua Branson <=
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/25
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/25
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28