[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:05:03 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 3/24/2008 6:52 AM:
| Right. I still wonder whether the step to "fix" m4wrap to obey Posix is
| the right thing to do in a stable(?) series such as 1.4.x.
|
| Good thing the failure isn't silent, BTW.
2.59 is nearly 5 years old, and a lot has been done to autoconf in the
meantime. And Autoconf's NEWS even states this as the first item for 2.60:
** Autoconf no longer depends on whether m4wrap is FIFO (as Posix requires)
~ or LIFO (as in GNU M4 1.4.x). GNU M4 2.0 is expected to conform to Posix
~ here, so m4wrap/m4_wrap users should no longer depend on LIFO behavior.
So if nothing else, we can argue that we have been giving fair warning,
for quite some time now.
However, autoconf 2.60 is less than 2 years old, which starts to be pretty
recent (the gnulib rule of thumb seems to be worrying about active support
for known software bugs up to 3 years old). I concede that it will
probably take some time before distros favor newer releases, but hopefully
the speedups realized by autoconf 2.62 and m4 1.6 will be driving factors
in the conversion.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkfnpv8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBAoACgigN+s99rHDS1nlTJpRZi91TH
ZYgAnjbj8yIEDMIDGaVio9tG65bnUKLy
=DmK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/23
- Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Eric Blake, 2008/03/23
- Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Eric Blake, 2008/03/23
- Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Eric Blake, 2008/03/24
- Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/24
- Re: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more, Eric Blake, 2008/03/24
- m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x (was: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/24
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x (was: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more), Keith Marshall, 2008/03/24
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x (was: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/24
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x (was: branch-1_4 cannot build Autoconf 2.59 any more), Keith Marshall, 2008/03/24
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x, Eric Blake, 2008/03/25
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/25
- Re: m4-1.4.x fails to build git Autoconf for some x, Eric Blake, 2008/03/25