[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils/IMAP (2)
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils/IMAP (2) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:09:28 -0800 |
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:42:26AM -0500, Alain Magloire wrote:
> > The other POP3 serves are broken. ;) I don't think there is any
> > compelling reason to not send any headers to the client, unless there
> > is some client that depends on a Status: header not being sent, in
> > which case its maintainers should be drawn, quartered, tarred,
> > feathered, and then really hurt.
>
> 8-)
> I think one of the reasons is they want the clients to see all messages
> downloaded as new messages. Since the "Status:" or the "X-Status:" by
> the c-client is use for the flag attributes (deleted, seen, etc ...).
I've used this to send an email with a date in the past and flagged as
read to make it seem as if they had gotten my request. I love Microsoft
Exchange. =)
--
I write portable software for a living, and my code has to compile
with gcc as well as with a variety of other compilers. [...] If
the price of that is to have Linus Torvalds insult me once in a while,
so be it.
- Joe Buck http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-01/msg00075.html
- mailutils/IMAP, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/10
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2),
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/11
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Harald Meland, 2001/01/15
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Alain Magloire, 2001/01/15
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry, 2001/01/15
- Re: mailutils/IMAP (2), Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo, 2001/01/15
- mailutil/X-UIDL, Alain Magloire, 2001/01/15