[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Mailutils new competitor
From: |
Jeff Breitner |
Subject: |
RE: Mailutils new competitor |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:52:08 -0500 |
I think it is silly. Defining other libs as "competitors" is like calling
PHP a competitor to Perl.
The right tool for the job always wins, and the library needs to define its
goals
and meet them. After that, the rest is easy.
However, it's never too late to fan the flames of acceptance (grin).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Behalf Of Jeff Bailey
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:50 AM
> To: Alain Magloire; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Mailutils new competitor
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:26:23PM -0500, Alain Magloire wrote:
>
> > There are other competitors beside Gnome Camel library etc ...
>
> This is silly. Do you think we should ask Brave GNU World to do a
> writeup on us so that people are aware we exist?
>
> --
> Talk is a trick for taking the mystery out of the world.
> - Seeker, Beyond the fall of night.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-mailutils mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
>
- Mailutils new competitor, Alain Magloire, 2001/02/09
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Jeff Bailey, 2001/02/13
- RE: Mailutils new competitor,
Jeff Breitner <=
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Alain Magloire, 2001/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Jeff Bailey, 2001/02/14
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Alain Magloire, 2001/02/15
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Sam Roberts, 2001/02/15
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Alain Magloire, 2001/02/16
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Jeff Bailey, 2001/02/17
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Sam Roberts, 2001/02/18
- Re: Mailutils new competitor, Jeff Bailey, 2001/02/18