[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils
From: |
Alain Magloire |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:00:46 -0500 (EST) |
>
> > around. IMHO(others on the list may not agree) it is cumbersome
> > to use, maybe the use of "C" was the problem 8-).
>
> Not so cumbersome at all. You're being too critical to it :^))
[[laughs]] 8-)
Maybe.
I think what I find cumbersome is trying to do OO with C.
I was in a conference at IBM listening to Havoc Pennigton(Gtk Fame)
saying how gtk is trying to be OO(with C) but if he could
turn back the clock he would use a real OO language (C++).
Trying to do OO with a structural language like C, is
a lot of kitchen work. For the last 5 months, I've been
doing Java day and nights ... so...
I do not want to scare anybody, but maybe(only maybe) we
should take a seriously look at some basic C++ for mailutils2
... Ok I've said it ... I feel better.
- Re: mailutils, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Richard Dawe, 2002/03/15
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/16
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/20
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21