[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] gdbm over NFS safety
From: |
Kostas Zorbadelos |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] gdbm over NFS safety |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:49:17 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Alain Magloire wrote:
>
>
> > Subject: [bug-mailutils] gdbm over NFS safety
> >
> > Hello.
> > I can see that the vacation action in sieve uses gdbm files. In our
> > setup we have NFS mounted mailboxes. Is it safe to use gdbm over NFS?
> >
>
> GDBM is multiple readers and 1 writer. So it uses a lock to restrict write
> access on the database. IIRC, POSIX fcntl(2) locking is NFS safe but not
> BSD flock(2), so you will need to make sure that your version of GDB is
> compiled with flock(2) enable and to disable flock(2).
> #undef HAVE_FLOCK
>
I am not sure if the locking issues are all there is to it [1].
Anyway, I will give a better look to gdbm to see and if gdbm is not
good enough I will search for db alternatives.
[1] http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/env/remote.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-mailutils mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
>
--
Kostas Zorbadelos
Systems Designer/Developer, Otenet SA
address@hidden contact: kzorba (at) otenet.gr
Out there in the darkness, out there in the night
out there in the starlight, one soul burns brighter
than a thousand suns.