Re: [bug-mailutils] imap[s] seg fault in mail[x]

[Paul Vojta]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:06:12AM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Paul Vojta <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> 
> > However, on further thought, it seems that all occurrences of sp in that
> > long if statement should really be sp1 -- otherwise they refer to text
> > after the ']', which doesn't make sense (keep in mind that my knowledge
> > of the IMAP protocol is next to nil).
> 
> No, the rest of the occurences are right. They are intended to point
> past the closing bracket, where, according to the protocol, a
> human-readable description of the problem is printed. For example, the ALERT
> response code is defined by RFC 2060 as:
> 
>      ALERT          The human-readable text contains a special alert
>                     that MUST be presented to the user in a
>                     fashion hat calls the user's attention to the message.
> 
> Here's an example of a server returning that code:
> 
> * OK [ALERT] System shutdown in 10 minutes

OK for most of them, but for BADCHARSET the optional list of character
sets seems to be inside the brackets.

--Paul