Re: ANN: ncurses-6.4-20240106

[Thomas Dickey]

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sven Joachim" <svenjoac@gmx.de>
| To: "Thomas Dickey" <dickey@his.com>
| Cc: "Ncurses Mailing List" <bug-ncurses@gnu.org>
| Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2024 4:27:26 PM
| Subject: Re: ANN: ncurses-6.4-20240106

| On 2024-01-07 01:02 +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
| 
|> 20240106
|>      + use ansi+arrows, ansi+apparrows, ansi+csr, ansi+erase, ansi+idc,
|>        ansi+idc1, ansi+idl, ansi+idl1, ansi+inittabs to trim -TD
| 
| These trims have introduced a few minor changes in the resulting
| compiled terminfo descriptions which seem to be unintended.
| 
| - wy520* have changed csr from \E[%i%p1%d;%p2%dr$<20> to
|  \E[%i%p1%d;%p2%dr, losing the delay.
| 
| - vt320-k311 has changed il1 from \E[L$<3/> to \E[L, losing the delay.

thanks - I see where I'll have to modify my script (and amend this batch).

| - visa50 has changed kcud1 from \E[A to \E[B.

actually the third is (I think) a correction -

ansi+arrows|ANSI normal-mode home and cursor-keys,
        kbs=^H, kcub1=\E[D, kcud1=\E[B, kcuf1=\E[C, kcuu1=\E[A,
        khome=\E[H,

That kcud1 was (before) the same as kcuu1, which makes up/down arrows the same.

Looking at the comment before the visa50, I'd expect that odd behavior to be
noticed - and it had been untouched since adding it initially (and fixing typos
from Raymond's version has dwindled down, but probably never completed).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
https://invisible-island.net