[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler
From: |
Erik Bågfors |
Subject: |
Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler |
Date: |
02 Jan 2003 12:44:34 +0100 |
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 22:46, Anders Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it may be hard to avoid doing at least a partial method lookup.
> The method '+' can't be overridden on the individual object level for
> Fixnums, so the lookup can be done directly at the class level, as Erik
> says. But at the class level the method can be changed at any time, so
> some kind of lookup has do be done.
>
Agreed.
> What are the plans for Fixnum in Cardinal, will it first be done as
> plain non-optimized objects, or is there already work being done on a
> "native" integer implementation?
There aren't many "plans" for cardinal at all yet, except for individual
peoples plans.
I believe we should start by doing the "slow but 100% compatible"-way
and then optimize after that.
/Erik
--
Erik Bågfors | address@hidden
Supporter of free software | GSM +46 733 279 273
fingerprint: 6666 A85B 95D3 D26B 296B 6C60 4F32 2C0B 693D 6E32
- [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Erik Bågfors, 2003/01/01
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Dan Sugalski, 2003/01/02
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Erik Bågfors, 2003/01/03
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Dan Sugalski, 2003/01/03
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Erik Bågfors, 2003/01/04
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Dan Sugalski, 2003/01/05
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Anders Bengtsson, 2003/01/05
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Dan Sugalski, 2003/01/05
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] RubyInRuby parser/compiler, Erik Bågfors, 2003/01/07