Re: [Ccrtp-devel] CMake based configuration for ccRTP

[David Sugar]

I am in favor of supporting cmake, especially if we can do it alongside
the existing autotools.  Yes, we need to do this down the stack,
including of course common c++ and there has already been one person
experimenting with commonc++ cmake.  I also actually do want to use
cmake in ucommon and sipwitch as well.

Werner Dittmann wrote:
> All,
> 
> during the last days I created files and functions to support
> CMake based configuration setup. In a first step I did this
> for the ZRTP extension because I know this best :-) . The
> new CMake configuration cover the same functionality as
> autoconf, but much simpler to handle. This includes
> configuration, the full make targets and includes building
> a RPM package . These files are already available in SVN.
> 
> I started to do the same for the ccRTP stuff. In my sandbox
> I have already a working setup that creates the ccRTP lib and
> creates a source distribution. Building a RPM package is the
> next step (quite easy), then adding the demo directory (also
> fairly easy).
> 
> I did this exercise because some (well, at least kdevelop4)
> development tools do not support autoconf/automake anymore and
> switched to CMake.
> 
> Both toolsets can live in parallel to simplify migration.
> 
> Question: would it be ok if I checkin the cmake stuff for ccRTP
> also once I completed the above steps? Of course this is a first
> working version only that should be enhanced over the time.
> 
> Regards,
> Werner
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ccrtp-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel

dyfet.vcf
Description: Vcard