[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SWING at OJE
From: |
Artur Biesiadowski |
Subject: |
Re: SWING at OJE |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Feb 2001 15:27:31 +0100 |
Nic Ferrier wrote:
> I agree. The seperation of layers is really bad and they keep making
> changes... I think Sun's real problem is the JNI which is not very
> useful for client side Java (thank goodness for GCJ and CNI).
>
> Perhaps you guys would consider doing a Swing port for GCJ? Using low
> level stuff called from CNI when necessary?
It is sad that swing can be 100% java and CNI doesn't have to be used...
As far as JNI/CNI is concerned... I don't know what you mean by client
side java. Is JNI any better at server side ? Anyway, CNI is really nice
if you want to stick with gcc, but I personally prefer to write more
code in native wrappers than to stick to certain subset of garbage
collectors.
Artur
Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05