[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately)
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately) |
Date: |
12 Nov 2001 17:06:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
"Etienne M. Gagnon" <address@hidden> writes:
> --- BEGIN ---
> As a special exception, if you link this library with other files to
> produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause the
> resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
> This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the
> executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
> If you modify this library, you may extend this exception to your version
> of the library but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to
> do so, delete this exception statement from your version.
> --- END ---
>
> Is this better?
I think so. Anyone think this is better with regards to gcj?
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Per Bothner, 2001/11/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Brian Jones, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately),
Brian Jones <=
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Norbert Bollow, 2001/11/12
- Re: Simple Proposal, Tom Tromey, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Mark Wielaard, 2001/11/09
Re: Simple Proposal, Chris Gray, 2001/11/08
Re: Simple Proposal, Brian Jones, 2001/11/08