[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.net.URI implementation
From: |
Giannis Georgalis |
Subject: |
Re: java.net.URI implementation |
Date: |
11 Feb 2003 00:24:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Per Bothner <address@hidden> writes:
> But you still have to allocate the parser object(s), which a
> hand-written parser doesn't have to. And object allocation
> is relatively expensive, in the context of parsing a URI.
Yes, you are right. So what you are suggesting is a hand-written
parser, don't you ?
btw: don't underestimate URIs
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22what+do+you+%22+want+to+eat+today&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0#END
;-)
--
Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad
idea which could only have originated in California.
- Edsger Dijkstra (attributed)
- java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Brian Jones, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation,
Giannis Georgalis <=
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
Re: java.net.URI implementation, Stephen Crawley, 2003/02/10
Re: java.net.URI implementation, Dalibor Topic, 2003/02/10