[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance
From: |
Jonathan Pryor |
Subject: |
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:47:35 -0400 |
Below...
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 10:30, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 15:08, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> > AOT (or pre-JITing) assemblies is not as useful as you'd think. It has
> > two primary effects:
> >
> > - Reduce memory requirements, as memory doesn't need to be allocated
> > for the JITed code
> > - Decrease startup time, as (again) the JITing doesn't need to be
> > done.
>
> Are you saying that mono doesn't have the ability to create shared
> libraries?
How did you get that interpretation from my statements? It boggles my
mind...
Mono AOT creates shared libraries. That's how startup time is reduced
-- the shared libraries contain the AOT code, so the code doesn't need
to be JITted.
- Jon
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, (continued)
- RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/13
- RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Stuart Ballard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jonathan Pryor, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Anthony Green, 2004/04/14
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance,
Jonathan Pryor <=
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Anthony Green, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Miguel de Icaza, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Miguel de Icaza, 2004/04/14