[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gij as JRE 5
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: gij as JRE 5 |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:26:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Montag, 15. November 2004 19:00 schrieb Tom Tromey:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> Actually, putting the new code on the trunk as well makes
> >> merging harder, not easier. That's because when it is put on
> >> the trunk all the generic bits must be stripped out, meaning
> >> that we'll have different versions of classes on the trunk and
> >> the branch. This probably isn't a severe problem, but I thought
> >> I'd mention it.
>
> Michael> Isn't this a problem without putting new features into
> HEAD Michael> too as the class gets changes on HEAD and generics
> branch Michael> anyway ?
>
> Yes, though there is a difference in degree. E.g., our collections
> classes are fairly mature and don't change very much. So
> re-merging those probably won't be too difficult.
I don't know for sure but I would consider the collection classes are
only a little part of the stuff that needs enhancements for 1.5.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
Re: gij as JRE 5, Andrew Haley, 2004/11/16