|
From: | Archie Cobbs |
Subject: | Re: NIO charsets attacked by gang of rabid platypi |
Date: | Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:53:07 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041129 |
Sven de Marothy wrote:
Also, I'd like to know which NIO charset provider is preferred, now that we have two in CVS. (pure java and iconv-based) They complement eachother pretty well, iconv being somewhat faster in the actual conversion, but with more overhead for invocation (=slower on shortstrings, faster on long ones).
Not really an answer, but here are some thoughts... All other things being equal, IMHO pure Java is better than Java+native. Of course all other things are not equal, in particular the speed question, but Java vs. native speed is very JVM dependent, so that detracts from the usefulness of using speed as a generic criterion. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |