Par contre ils indiquent qu'ils sont distribué sous licence Creative Common
qui est à priori incompatible avec la GPL !
Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode> (a.k.a. CC-BY)
This is a non-copyleft free license that is good for art and entertainment
works, and educational works. Please don't use it for software or
documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU
FDL.
Creative Commons publishes many licenses which are very different.
Therefore, to say that a work ³uses a Creative Commons license² is to leave
the principal questions about the work's licensing unanswered. When you see
such a statement in a work, please ask the author to highlight the substance
of the license choices. And if someone proposes to ³use a Creative Commons
license² for a certain work, it is vital to ask immediately, ³Which one?²
Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode> (a.k.a. CC-BY-SA)
This is a copyleft free license that is good for artistic and entertainment
works, and educational works. Please don't use it for software or
documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU
FDL.
Le 20/04/10 14:43, « jean-yves Klein » <address@hidden> a
écrit :
http://www.commentcamarche.net/news/5851883-lancement-d-un-pack-de-logiciels
-libres-pour-les-tpe