|
From: | Tim McCormack |
Subject: | [Duplicity-tracker] [sr #106538] Why ask for GnuPG passphrase when only encrypting (and not signing)? |
Date: | Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:45:23 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092510 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.3 |
URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?106538> Summary: Why ask for GnuPG passphrase when only encrypting (and not signing)? Project: duplicity Submitted by: phyzome Submitted on: Sun 02 Nov 2008 06:45:17 PM GMT Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal Severity: 3 - Normal Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: None _______________________________________________________ Details: When I ask for an encrypted backup (--encrypt-key=XXXXXX) and don't specify a --sign-key, shouldn't duplicity be able to do the backup without asking for keys? Otherwise, what's the point of PKI? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?106538> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |