--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/6] Add Yubikey Manager and Its Dependencies |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:38:14 -0700 |
Hi,
This patch series adds Yubikey Manager (ykman) and its dependencies.
It applies cleanly to fd6d2fd871aa3eb443037483998b7790d15be709.
I've validated that the ykman CLI works with my own personal YubiKey 4
Nano that I've owned for a few years. I've verified that rudimentary
operations such as "ykman openpgp info" and "ykman mode OTP+FIDO+CCID"
succeed, but I didn't exhaustively check all possible operations.
Along the way, I've noticed that Mozilla's Public Suffix List database
is embedded in at least one existing Guix package: ruby-public-suffix.
I've opened a bug report about this:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35332
We can fix that bug by replacing the bundled copy with the one
provided by the public-suffix-list package introduced here.
Chris Marusich (6):
gnu: Add python-pyfakefs and python2-pyfakefs.
gnu: Add python-pyscard and python2-pyscard.
gnu: Add libu2f-host.
gnu: Add public-suffix-list.
gnu: Add python-fido2 and python2-fido2.
gnu: Add python-yubikey-manager and python2-yubikey-manager.
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/check.scm | 49 ++++
gnu/packages/dns.scm | 51 +++++
.../python-pyfakefs-remove-bad-test.patch | 23 ++
gnu/packages/security-token.scm | 211 +++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/python-pyfakefs-remove-bad-test.patch
--
2.20.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#35333] [PATCH 0/6] Add Yubikey Manager and Its Dependencies |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:14:57 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ricardo and Danny,
Thank you for your time!
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> I then manually filled in the body and the following headers:
>>
>> From: Chris Marusich <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [bug#35333] [PATCH 0/6] Add Yubikey Manager and Its
>> Dependencies
>
> I don’t think this is necessary.
>
>> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
>
> You can use “--in-reply-to” from the command line instead.
Thank you for the tip!
Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:
> the series LGTM!
I've committed this as 4728806185a0d85155ea4db795d1643a8c849d65.
Closing!
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---