emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#53222: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add autokey.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#53222: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add autokey.)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 20:33:01 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:32:51 +0100
with message-id <871r183fkc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#53222] [PATCH] gnu: autokey fix paths.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53222,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add autokey.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53222: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53222
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add autokey. Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:03:00 +0000
Hello,

Here is a patch for autokey, a python based program for things like keyboard 
shortcuts and text expansion. I find it invaluable for having emacs-like keys 
everywhere.

It includes both a gtk and qt frontend; after discussion on IRC I decided 
against trying to split them. Since it is one package and it is built together, 
it is a bit tricky I think to disentangle the code and paths needed for each. 
In my first attempts it didn't reduce the closure and needed a lot of manual 
work. Possibly it could work with more effort, but since this is used as a GUI 
tool primarily, the GTK/QT packages shouldn't be adding anything new.

John

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-autokey.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#53222] [PATCH] gnu: autokey fix paths. Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:32:51 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:

> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Saturday, January 15th, 2022 at 6:17 AM, Maxime Devos 
> <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
>
>> John Kehayias schreef op vr 14-01-2022 om 22:48 [+0000]:
>>
>> [...]
>> > [...] So I think everything should be good now?
>>
>> AFAICT, yes.
>>
>
> Great, thanks for the instructive review again!

Applied. Thank you, and thanks to Maxime for the in-depth review.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]