bug#53260: closed (char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:47:01 +0100
with message-id <748AD547-562F-495C-9BEC-D406953CFE4D@acm.org>
and subject line Re: bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode 
[PATCH]
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53260,
regarding char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53260: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53260
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:43:00 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Fchar_syntax and the bytecode Bchar_syntax differ:
>
> Fchar_syntax calls SETUP_BUFFER_SYNTAX_TABLE. Bchar_syntax does not.
> Bchar_syntax converts arguments to multibyte. Fchar_syntax does not.
>
> The last property can be used to get different behaviour:
>
> (let ((cs (byte-compile (lambda (x) (char-syntax x)))))
>   (with-temp-buffer
>     (let ((st (make-syntax-table)))
>       (set-buffer-multibyte nil)
>       (modify-syntax-entry 128 "_" st)
>       (set-syntax-table st)
>       (list (funcall cs 128) (char-syntax 128)))))
> -> (119 95)
>
> Not sure how to expose the presence or absence of SETUP_BUFFER_SYNTAX_TABLE. 
> Suggestions?
>
> And, most importantly, what would be the correct code?
>
> (I suppose char-syntax is rare enough that we could call Fchar_syntax from 
> Bchar_syntax and thus avoid any future divergence.)
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode [PATCH]
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:47:01 +0100
>
>
>
>
> 20 jan. 2022 kl. 10.30 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>:
>
> > Makes sense to me.  Unless Stefan has any further comments, please go
> > ahead and push.
>
> Thank you, pushed with a necessary modification: SETUP_BUFFER_SYNTAX_TABLE() is 
> indeed necessary in Fchar_syntax because syntax.c has its own local #define 
> SYNTAX() and doesn't use the one in syntax.h. Lovely.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---