bug#58602: closed (29.0.50; Please document (:documentation FORM) spec for closures )

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2022 01:23:38 +0200
with message-id <87y1tb75z9.fsf@web.de>
and subject line Re: bug#58602: 29.0.50; Please document (:documentation FORM) 
spec for closures
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58602,
regarding 29.0.50; Please document (:documentation FORM) spec for closures 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
58602: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58602
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 29.0.50; Please document (:documentation FORM) spec for closures 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 18 Oct 2022 02:46:00 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I think we need to document this new feature described in etc/NEWS.25:
>
> | ** Lexical closures can use '(:documentation FORM)' to build their docstring.
> | It should be placed right where the docstring would be, and FORM is then
> | evaluated (and should return a string) when the closure is built.
>
> at least in the ELisp reference manual (dunno, maybe also in the
> docstring of `lambda' and `defun'?).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#58602: 29.0.50; Please document (:documentation FORM) spec for closures
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 20 Oct 2022 01:23:38 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
> > > [...] I noticed that `i :documentation RET` doesn't bring me to this
> > > text, instead it just looks for "documentation"
>
> > `Info-index':
> >   ;; Strip leading colon in topic; index format does not allow them.
> >   (if (and (stringp topic)
> >          (> (length topic) 0)
> >          (= (aref topic 0) ?:))
> >       (setq topic (substring topic 1)))
>
> Yes, deleting that part breaks the i command, so I guess we have to live
> with this restriction or find a way to filter out the wanted matches.
>
> Anyway, I think we are done here.  Thanks to all, and especially Stefan.
>
> Michael.
>
>
> --- End Message ---