bug#61102: closed (28.1; with-selected-window/save-window-excursion calls buffer-list-update-hook only once)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2023 21:56:56 +0200
with message-id <83bkmbx2lz.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#61102: 28.1; 
with-selected-window/save-window-excursion calls buffer-list-update-hook only 
once
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61102,
regarding 28.1; with-selected-window/save-window-excursion calls 
buffer-list-update-hook only once
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
61102: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61102
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 28.1; with-selected-window/save-window-excursion calls buffer-list-update-hook only once
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:29:06 +0000
>
>
>
>
> The following code:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>
> (let ((fn (lambda () (message "Buffer changed: %S" (current-buffer)))))
>   (add-hook 'buffer-list-update-hook fn)
>   (with-selected-window (minibuffer-window)  
>     (save-window-excursion nil) nil)
>   (remove-hook 'buffer-list-update-hook fn)
>   nil)
>   
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Prints "Buffer changed: #<buffer  *Minibuf-0*>" once, even though the selection 
> should return to the currently selected buffer (which is different from the 
> mini-buffer).
>
> I would expect either that the hook 'buffer-list-update-hook is not called at 
> all, or that it is called twice (one time for every change of the selected 
> buffer).
>
> Best regards,
> -- Al
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#61102: 28.1; with-selected-window/save-window-excursion calls buffer-list-update-hook only once
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 02 Feb 2023 21:56:56 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 19:16:34 +0100
> > Cc: abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com, 61102@debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> > 
> >  > So do you agree with me that there's no bug here?
> > 
> > Yes.
>
> Thanks, I'm therefore closing this bug.  (The issue can still be
> discussed even though the bug is closed.)
>
>
> --- End Message ---