bug#62769: closed (pcre: correct overpessimistic error checking of pcre2_jit_compile())

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:57:29 -0700
with message-id <f7d9bad2-aa1a-75c1-3015-e0d09335315a@cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line Re: bug#62769: pcre: correct overpessimistic error checking of 
pcre2_jit_compile()
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62769,
regarding pcre: correct overpessimistic error checking of pcre2_jit_compile()
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
62769: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62769
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: pcre: correct overpessimistic error checking of pcre2_jit_compile() Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 23:47:08 -0700

The original code was done in a way that would be useful during
porting, but that would hinder future work unnecessarily.

Carlo

0001-pcre-correct-overpessimistic-error-checking-of-pcre2.patch
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#62769: pcre: correct overpessimistic error checking of pcre2_jit_compile()
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:57:29 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
>
>
>
>
> On 4/11/23 23:08, Carlo Arenas wrote:
> > Yes. but I would probably prefer voiding the return value to make it explicit.
>
> Thanks for checking. Casting expressions to void is not our style so 
> I'll omit that (the comment makes things obvious to the reader anyway). 
> So I installed the patch without the cast.
>
>
> --- End Message ---