emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#65094: closed (30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#65094: closed (30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package)
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 07:04:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2023 10:03:54 +0300
with message-id <83edkgr6sl.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#65094: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under 
Package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65094,
regarding 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
65094: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65094
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 14:14:41 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Hi all,

is there a specific reason why `package-menu-filter-upgradable' bound to
'/ u' is missing in package menu under "Package -> Filter packages"?
All other filtering commands described in the manual[1] are available
there.

`package-menu-filter-upgradable' was added with commit 8c96c720fa.

Best, Arash

Footnotes:
[1]  https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Package-Menu.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#65094: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 10:03:54 +0300
> From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
> Cc: 65094@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 22:06:14 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Thanks, but can we make the help-echo string a bit more helpful, by
> > not just repeating what the item's name says?  What does it mean "by
> > upgradeability" -- does it mean only packages that can be upgraded
> > will be shown? if so, let's say so.
> >
> > (Yes, I know the other help-echo are also of this kind, but that
> > doesn't mean they are a good example to follow...)
> 
> My choice was driven solely by symmetry to the other entries.  Maybe
> something like this:

Thanks, installed.  But what I had in mind is the kind of changes I
made in the followup commit, please take a look.

Closing the bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]