bug#65303: closed (emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:18:43 -0700
with message-id <a1da1789-f6ac-48a1-4ae7-eba4cb64ffae@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi 
Introduction
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65303,
regarding emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
65303: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65303
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:28:20 +1200

I've found an inconsistency in the Introduction to eshell.texi. It specifies as part of
a search pattern for Word Document files that are 100k or larger and six
months or older the following footnoted pattern:

ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)

That nets me files bigger than 50k, not the 100k specified in the paragraph. Here's

a quick diff supplying a correction.

===== diff =====
diff --git a/doc/misc/eshell.texi b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
index b5311e63a56..26f282de69c 100644
--- a/doc/misc/eshell.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Introduction
 Any tool you use often deserves the time spent learning to master it.
 @footnote{For the understandably curious, here is what that command
 looks like: But don't let it fool you; once you know what's going on,
-it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)}.}
+it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+100aM+5)}.}
 
 @menu
 * Contributors to Eshell::      People who have helped out!
===== end diff =====

Regards, brickviking

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:18:43 -0700
>
>
>
>
> On 8/15/2023 10:13 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
> > Fixed in 21b2ecee661 on the release branch, and closing this bug.
>
> Scratch that. *Now* this bug is closed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---