--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200 |
"lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added.
Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would
it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?
Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?
Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700 |
Version: 29.2
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:
> "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
> a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added.
Done.
> Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
> provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would
> it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?
>
> Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?
Fixed in Bug#62751.
> Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
> the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.
Done.
Thanks for paying attention to this aspect. I installed the fixes on
emacs-29 (commit 71a1f0fdc9e), and am consequently closing this bug
report.
--- End Message ---