emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#55388: closed (28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#55388: closed (28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 23:16:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700
with message-id 
<CADwFkm=_wCNc3fX+FPKVY_jVmisMNR869LU8nCULd1z20s2ypA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a 
package nor provide a feature
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55388,
regarding 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a 
feature
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55388: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55388
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200
"lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
a "Package" library header.  I think "Package: emacs" should be added.

Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package.  Would
it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?

Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?

Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700
Version: 29.2

Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:

> "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
> a "Package" library header.  I think "Package: emacs" should be added.

Done.

> Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
> provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package.  Would
> it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?
>
> Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?

Fixed in Bug#62751.

> Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
> the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.

Done.

Thanks for paying attention to this aspect.  I installed the fixes on
emacs-29 (commit 71a1f0fdc9e), and am consequently closing this bug
report.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]