emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#66566: closed ([PATCH 0/3] Refactor GNU poke definition.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#66566: closed ([PATCH 0/3] Refactor GNU poke definition.)
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 14:10:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2023 16:08:34 +0200
with message-id <87y1fwqd99.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#66566] [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Remove emacs-poke.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66566,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] Refactor GNU poke definition.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66566: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66566
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Refactor GNU poke definition. Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 18:44:47 +0100
Notable changes:
* Removed obsolete comments and inputs from poke.
* Subsumed emacs-poke into poke.
  NOTE: The emacs-poke naming is confusing as there exists a ELPA poke package
  which is an emacs interface for GNU poke. The modes provided by our emacs-poke
  package are seldomly used and emacs/poke people are mostly looking for
  emacs-poke-mode which is being added with #66561 [1] so to prevent intolerable
  confusion in the future emacs-poke has been pre-emptively removed to make way
  for the ELPA poke.

[1]: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66561>

Bruno Victal (3):
  gnu: poke: Revise package definition.
  gnu: poke: Install emacs modes.
  gnu: Remove emacs-poke.

 gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 39 +++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)


base-commit: a0d2ecde943bd1854ddbb7c0cad35a1fc64dc5ab
-- 
2.41.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#66566] [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Remove emacs-poke. Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 16:08:34 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Hi Bruno,

Bruno Victal <mirai@makinata.eu> skribis:

> On 2023-10-20 23:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> But since ‘poke’ now provides the Emacs mode, should we:
>> 
>>   (define-public emacs-poke
>>     (deprecated-package "emacs-poke" poke))
>> 
>> for now?
>> 
>> (I can do it on your behalf, let me know.)
>
> Go ahead! I think there's no harm in doing this but do leave a comment
> above it indicating that the package can be substituted anytime in the
> future with the ELPA 'poke'.

Done, thanks!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]