--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] doc: Fix example in list-transduce example. |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:01:06 +0100 |
While the `.' might be correct from a grammatical point of view (I do
not know), it turns the example into invalid scheme code, which is not
ideal. New users (like me) might try to copy the whole line and wonder
why it does not work (like I did). So delete it.
* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-171 General Discussion): Delete the
trailing . from the example.
---
doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
index 0cdf56923..09b591e89 100644
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
@@ -5748,7 +5748,7 @@ reducer with result-so-far and the maybe-transformed
input.
A simple example is as following:
@example
-(list-transduce (tfilter odd?) + '(1 2 3 4 5)).
+(list-transduce (tfilter odd?) + '(1 2 3 4 5))
@end example
This first returns a transducer filtering all odd
--
2.41.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#68507: [PATCH] doc: Fix example in list-transduce example. |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:14:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> While the `.' might be correct from a grammatical point of view (I do
> not know), it turns the example into invalid scheme code, which is not
> ideal. New users (like me) might try to copy the whole line and wonder
> why it does not work (like I did). So delete it.
>
> * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-171 General Discussion): Delete the
> trailing . from the example.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---