bug#69024: closed ([PATCH] Breaking change in tree-sitter-typescript/tsx starting version 0.20.4)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 11 Feb 2024 14:27:46 +0200
with message-id <8ef060fd-f4b0-4d30-8c2b-75666d695337@gutov.dev>
and subject line Re: bug#69024: [PATCH] Breaking change in 
tree-sitter-typescript/tsx starting version 0.20.4
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69024,
regarding [PATCH] Breaking change in tree-sitter-typescript/tsx starting 
version 0.20.4
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
69024: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69024
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Breaking change in tree-sitter-typescript/tsx starting version 0.20.4 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 00:38:43 +0100 User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hi,

A similar patch is also needed for Typescript/TSX in relation to this closed bug in Javascript :

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68879

The attached patch should do the job.

Thank you in advance.

Loïc Lemaître

0001-Handle-tree-sitter-grammar-breaking-change-for-funct.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#69024: [PATCH] Breaking change in tree-sitter-typescript/tsx starting version 0.20.4
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 11 Feb 2024 14:27:46 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla Thunderbird
>
>
>
>
> On 11/02/2024 08:50, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 05:02:17 +0200
> > > From: Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>
> > >
> > > On 11/02/2024 01:38, Loïc Lemaître wrote:
> > > > A similar patch is also needed for Typescript/TSX in relation to this
> > > > closed bug in Javascript :
> > > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68879
> > > >
> > > > The attached patch should do the job.
> > > Thanks for the patch! Pushed to emacs-29.
> > Should this bug be closed now?
> >
> > And what about bug#68924 -- does this solve that one as well?
>
> Yep, closing.
>
>
> --- End Message ---