[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:49:31 +0000 (GMT) |
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
>Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> C-c C-c is currently globally unbound and I suggest we bind it to `compile'.
>The would violate the separation of keyspace between major modes and
>Emacs. I would support changing the the major mode binding in cc-mode
>to compile. It is currently bound to "comment-region", which is a
>waste, since comment-region has a global binding (M-;).
No it hasn't. M-; is globally bound to `comment-dwim', an almost, but
not quite, entirely unlike operation, except when transient-mark minor
mode is enabled. In CC Mode, C-c C-c is bound to `comment-region'.
`compile' does not belong by default in a language mode's key binding
space, because it is not part of manipulating the text of that language.
If anything, `compile' should be in the global map, and tailored to each
mode where it is useful. In my not so humble opinion, of course. ;-)
Surely in this discussion, CC Mode should have priority over the use of
this binding because of its name. :-)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
address@hidden
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/31
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25