[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:14:25 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 07:03:49PM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> If we look for a binding for "text processor" modes only, it would be
> more logical to have the face bindings on, e.g.
>
> C-c C-b => bold
> C-c C-a => italic (easier to type that C-c C-i)
> C-c C-d => default
> etc.
That's something to be wary of though, as it uses up so many bindings.
It _might_ be appropriate for the most common faces in a pure word-processor
mode, but I'd be afraid of it interfering with many other natural bindings in
a mode that tried to add other functionality.
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/31