[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright years
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright years |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:49:12 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>
> Date: 09 Feb 2006 05:00:24 -0500
>
> the rationale is: "there" is all of emacs, and each file must not
> present a hole in the protection of all of emacs.
My problem is that the GNU Coding Standards still have this paragraph:
This copyright notice only needs to mention the most recent year in
which changes were made---there's no need to list the years for previous
versions' changes.
To me, ``the most recent year in which changes were made'' clearly
says that you change the copyright year(s) only when you make changes
in that file.
IANAL, so if these instructions are changed, I won't mind. I just
want them to be clear and unequivocal, and uniform across all the
packages that are part of the GNU project.
- Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: Copyright years, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/05
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, David Kastrup, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Lennart Borgman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/11
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10