[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locate-with-filter
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: locate-with-filter |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:05:54 -0500 |
When looking at the value of any variable e.g auto-mode-alist all explicit
links have been deliberately removed because some were inappropriate
e.g those for `features'.
Ok, I see what you mean now.
I think that Luc's idea of using C-c C-c for those should work ok.
However, we could also treat the value specially in a different manner.
We could make RET and Mouse-2 equivalent to C-c C-c, but only in the value.
- Re: locate-with-filter, (continued)
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/28
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/29
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/29
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/30
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/31
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/31
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/14
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15