[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Steve Kargl |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:46:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:59:11AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Frankly, I strongly prefer the current error formating.
I agree with FX.
>
> It is not necessary to completely change the format, nor to make it
> human unfriendly, merely make sure that key info (filename/line/colum)
> is available in a standard form.
>
> I.e., keep the verbose "squishy good for humans" stuff (e.g. showing a
> little picture of where the error occurred), but change the numeric info
> into a standard form. As Stefan mentioned, the difference seems rather
> gratuitous (" In file F:L" versus "F:L:").
>
Are you aware that gfortran can report errors that span multiple lines?
--
Steve
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/10/30