[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: display-pixel behavior changed on Mac OS X]
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: display-pixel behavior changed on Mac OS X] |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:29:35 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.97 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:03:52 -0400, Richard Matthew Stallman
>>>>> <address@hidden> said:
> Would someone please update the documentation string of
> x-display-pixel-width, and the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual?
Something like "When the screen spans multiple monitors, the function
returns the width (height) of the whole screen"? It looks a bit
superfluous to me.
The current documentation string of x-display-pixel-width:
Returns the width in pixels of the X display DISPLAY.
The optional argument DISPLAY specifies which display to ask about.
DISPLAY should be either a frame or a display name (a string).
If omitted or nil, that stands for the selected frame's display.
The documentation string of display-pixel-width:
Return the width of DISPLAY's screen in pixels.
For character terminals, each character counts as a single pixel.
The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual:
-- Function: display-pixel-width &optional display
This function returns the width of the screen in pixels. On a
character terminal, it gives the width in characters.
> What about x-display-pixel-height? Was it changed in a similar way?
For Mac OS, yes. I'm not sure how the W32 port work on such settings.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden