|
From: | Andreas Röhler |
Subject: | Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode) |
Date: | Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:39:18 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
Am 15.03.2013 01:42, schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
Richard Stallman writes: > Ad hominem, Richard? That's usually beneath you. > > It is not an ad-hominem attack, it is criticism of what you are > saying. You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but an attribution of intent to me. That is, without doubt, argumentum ad hominem. Your attribution was also false. I am genuinely concerned that the FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments.
Hi Stephen, sounds good and justified. BTW can you remember a case, where the claimed purpose of the assignment came into action? I.e. did FSF act at US-courts based on it's Emacs copyright ownership? Also: why is the famous assigment text hardly visible in the net throughout years? Best, Andreas I don't know if
it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you seemed to be making.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |