|
From: | Robert Weiner |
Subject: | Re: why is site-lisp placed before the default load path? |
Date: | Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:47:58 -0400 |
>>>>> "RW" == Robert Weiner <address@hidden> writes:
RW> If a package unintentionally shadows/overrides a standard/core Emacs
RW> library, then it is the package that is broken and needs to be fixed. If
RW> instead the behavior is intentional then that is what the current load-path
RW> order is designed to allow.
The point is that if sub directories are nto automatically included, it is
easier to manage things. Especially when using one's dist's packaging.
I had to make substantial changes to my .emacs when the auto sub dirs
was added to fix all of the damage that caused.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |