[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to process-lines for tramp
|
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
|
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to process-lines for tramp |
|
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 04:06:27 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:
> I would, nevertheless, welcome a more flexible process-lines, whether
> via keyword arguments, a separate function, or otherwise.
Given that process-lines boils down to a call-process followed by
(split-string (buffer-string) "\n"), one "otherwise" solution would be
to provide a convenience function which does the buffer-splitting (but
in a more efficient way than split-string).
One could then mix and match call-process, process-file, et al. with
this new convenience function. YMMV.
--
Basil