Re: accumulated timers which machine is in suspend-to-ram

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:12:17 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > "The same" meaning that in your case it's also savehist-save that runs
> > repeatedly?
> 
> I think so, yes.  I profiled the situation multiple times.
> `savehist-save' always had an amount of ~ 60%, also garbage collection
> had a large amount.  What I can't say is whether `savehist-save' had
> been called repeatedly or if the calls only took extremely long.  I'll
> try to use the tracer to check that.

Thanks.

Hmm... if by "few weeks" Stefan meant something that could have
started in February, then maybe it's 476066e8?  Or 988e37f?