[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eglot and Tramp
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: Eglot and Tramp |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:18:27 +0100 |
[sorry for the duplicate, Michael]
Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:54 PM Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> Yes. You could add (tramp "2.4.4") to your Package-Requires: header,
> >> this will be the next version in GNU ELPA. However, this would mean a
> >> dependency for all Eglot users, even if they are not interested in
> >> Tramp. Hmm.
> >
> > What Hmm? :-) Emacs users who are not "interested in Tramp" still get
> > it, too, right? Or does Tramp 2.4.4 come with some kind of potential
> > built-in annoyance? :-D
>
> No annoyance. But a user of Emacs 26.3 has Tramp 2.3.5 built-in. Because
> of Eglot, Tramp 2.4.4 would be installed for her from GNU ELPA, w/o
> having asked for.
Well, this user did ask for Eglot. He will also get an updated
xref.el, project.el eldoc.el, flymake.el as already happens. I'm
afraid this is just how inter-package dependencies work.
As long as Tramp 2.4.4 is (mostly) backward compatible to 2.3.5's uses...
there should be no (little) problem.
João
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp,
João Távora <=
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, João Távora, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/06/19
- Re: Eglot and Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/19