|
From: | Ergus |
Subject: | Re: etags name collision. |
Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:03:09 +0200 |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 06:51:11PM +0800, Po Lu wrote:
Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> writes:I use OpenBSD in my servers daily and all my team around use vim and neovim with Universal Ctags with no issue. Universal ctags can generate emacs tags, json, legacy and modern ctags, xref... if there is some problem the right to do is to open an issue in their project...vim and neovim are not vi and mg, and are not standardized utilities either.
So you mean that we should maintain this executable with an old name that collides with a better modern one; useful for all the vim (and other editors) users, just to support two editors that are not emacs, very popular and with minimal maintenance... Any way I am tired of this pointless discussion... When things start like this in the list we end up going nowhere. Best, Ergus
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |