Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
access to Windows right now, so I can't test anything.
It's WindowsXP and please have a look at the attached picture. Both
Mukti and Likhan is installed but your one is showing in the list but
Mukti is not..
Anyway, the only thing I remember not happening in older versions of Likhan
was that Windows didn't automatically recognize it as a bengali font --
e.g., if you go to IE's Tools -> Internet Options -> Fonts and select
bengali, Likhan wasn't listed. What is happening with Mukti ?
I know this issue. I don't know why. Our SolaimanLipi and Rupali comes
in both IE and Desktop, but I don't know why. I think Windows RAG
KORECHE as you didn't made the font using any M$ software :D RAG KOMLE
everything will be alright :)
What exactly are the arguments against maintaining Mukti Narrow using
pfaedit ? (And in fact moving the OT lookups into the 'template' format ?)
pfaedit has a Windows version, BTW, though it needs the cygwin
environment.
Well, there is not arguments. I made some Kerning changes, which I have
mentioned earlier in the list mail. I posted the modified font
yesterday and waiting for your decision.
Omi
|