[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++
From: |
Mateusz Loskot |
Subject: |
Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++ |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:09:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) |
Micha wrote:
> Compiled, and running, on both i386 and AMD64. I'll move back to gcmd
> on both my new boxes. I note that i have to install python2.4-dev for
> python-support. (Debian unstable/testing)
>
> Piotr:
>> * faster and more robust code
>
> Do you mean C++ is faster in runing or in writing code ... ? I always
> thought plain C is fastest.
There is no simple answer or "linear" function, but there is a lot of
myth about which one performs better C/C++.
There is *no* reason to consider C++ language as slower than C, by
design or any other factor.
Although, the only answer is "measure it".
Cheers
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
- [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Piotr Eljasiak, 2007/02/23
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Micha, 2007/02/23
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Magnus Stålnacke, 2007/02/24
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Micha, 2007/02/26
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++,
Mateusz Loskot <=
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Magnus Stålnacke, 2007/02/26
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Piotr Eljasiak, 2007/02/27
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Piotr Eljasiak, 2007/02/27
Re: [gcmd-dev] Migration to C++, Magnus Stålnacke, 2007/02/24