[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ? |
Date: |
05 Jul 2004 18:53:49 +0100 |
Werner Almesberger <werner@almesberger.net> writes:
> I'm working on a project that contains a piece of software for
> which we'd like to allow non-free plugins. There would also be a
> GPL or LGPL-licensed plugin that uses the same interface. Now,
> we're trying to decide on the appropriate license for that piece
> of software. The license should come from the "GNU family", i.e.
> GPL or LGPL.
I think the following part of the GPL faq should cover your question,
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCLinkingOverControlledInterface
--
Brian Gough
Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing Free Software Manuals --- http://www.network-theory.co.uk/
- LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Werner Almesberger, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?,
Brian Gough <=
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Ben Pfaff, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06