[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:00:53 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan writes:
> You seem to consider the set of rules of the legal system as a logic
> system and then try to infer whatever you want to prove.
A common error. Fortunately, law is interpreted by judges, not theorem
provers.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, (continued)
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java,
John Hasler <=
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/03